TMI Blog1994 (12) TMI 36X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was correct in deciding that there was no justification for retaining the addition of Rs. 1,07,118 and directing the deletion of the same ? " The assessee is a manufacturer of cotton yarn. In the books of account relevant for the assessment year 1975-76, it had credited the sales tax account with a sum of Rs. 2,25,416 and debited the sam ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ales tax is collected by the Assessing Officers of the Sales Tax Department, that portion of the sales tax collection would be deemed to be the trading receipts and as such liable to be taxed. In support of his contention, learned standing counsel for the Department relied on a decision in Chowringhee Sales Bureau P. Ltd. v. CIT [1973] 87 ITR 542, wherein the Supreme Court held that : " the amount ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ax collections the assessee maintained a separate account and these were not brought into his trading account. The Income-tax Officer treated the excess collections as the assessee's income. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal held that the assessee's actual liability to sales tax has to be deducted therefrom. On these facts, this court held that the collections of sales tax cons ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g in the abovesaid two decisions. According to the facts arising in this case, in view of the State Government's order in G. O. Ms. No. 2771 dated September 30, 1969, as a matter of relief to the textile industry the Government had authorised retention of 50 per cent. of the sales tax due from the mills as an interest-free loan for a period of five years. According to the abovesaid G. O., the Gove ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|