9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (11) TMI 1206X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... der so as to warrant interference of this Court. Revision dismissed. - CIVIL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. 128 of 2014 - - - Dated:- 17-11-2014 - Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J. Counsel for Revisionist : K.C. Sinha,Sunil ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and perused the record. 2. Defect is removed. Let revision be registered with regula ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Court and that is how issue no. 6 was decided against defendants and in favour of plaintiff. It is not the case of the revisionists that the suit for cancellation of sale deed was not founded on fraud and misrepresentation and, therefore, in view of Full Bench decision in Ram Padarath and others Vs. IInd Additional District Judge and others, 1989(1) AWC 290 it is within the jurisdiction of civil ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f law for getting a document cancelled and instead drives a party to revenue court claiming a different relief and that of cancellation which a revenue court cannot grant holding the deed to be void. 16. This is what has also been held by Apex Court in Shri Ram Anr. Vs. Ist Additional District Judge Ors., 2001 (92) RD 241. 17. In Bismillah Vs. Janeshwar Prasad (supra) Apex ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 5. Learned counsel for the revisionist could not point out any illegality, material irregularity or jurisdictional error in the impugned order so as to warrant interference of this Court. He also could not substantiate any argument to distinguish the law laid down as discussed in above binding precedents so as to pursue this Court to take a different view in the matter or to distinguish those aut ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
