TMI Blog2019 (8) TMI 146X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lant Shri N. Ram Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent. ORDER PER: MS. SULEKHA BEEVI C.S 1. The facts of the case are that the respondents are manufacturers of bulk drugs and use ethanol as input for manufacture of final products. They purchase ethanol from M/s Andhra Sugars Limited who were paying excise duty on the product for many years. A show cause notice was served upon respondents raising ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt reported in [2016 (339) ELT 263 (Tri.-Hyd.)] and Final Order No. 22100-22102/2015, dt. 28.10.2015. 3. The Ld. AR, Shri A.V.L.N. Chary appeared on behalf of the department. He reiterated the grounds of appeal. 4. Following the decision in the respondent's own case, the appeal filed by the department is without merits. On the very same issue, the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court of Andhra Prad ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|