Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (8) TMI 571

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d been destroyed. This was not something in the control of the Assessee. On its part it gave the full details to the AO including the FIR number reporting the loss of records due to the fire. The Court fails to appreciate how the Assessee could have done anything more to substantiate the fact that it had to pay ₹ 2 lakhs to the company towards the shortage of stock. The fact of the Assessee having actually paid the company the said amount is also not in dispute. Revenue submitted that even in earlier AYs deductions have been claimed by the Assessee on account of shortage of stock for the varying amounts. The Court fails to see how this could be a factor that works against the Assessee. Being in the business of running a showroom .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Delhi. It entered into a franchisee agreement on 12th July, 1995 with Coats Viyella India Limited and it was appointed franchisee to sell Allen Solly brand of products at its showroom in Karol Bagh, New Delhi. As a franchisee, the Assessee was obliged to stock and sell the products supplied by the aforementioned company only. Under clauses 21 and 22 of the Franchisee Agreement, it was the Assessee which was accountable to the company in case of loss of goods. 4. In November, 2000, the franchise agreement was cancelled and in the final account statement prepared by the company, a sum of ₹ 2 lakhs on account of stock shortage was debited and recovered from the assessee. In the return filed for AY 2001-2002, in computing the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed counsel for the parties, the Court is of the view that the plea of the Assessee ought to have been accepted in the first instance by the AO. The Assessee placed on record the agreement under which it was obliged to bear the loss for shortage of stock. The Assessee also placed on record the statement of account in terms of which it had to pay the company ₹ 2 lakhs towards shortage of stock. It is not as if the Assessee did not make an effort to ascertain the details. It was informed that on account of fire, those details could not be provided as the records had been destroyed. This was not something in the control of the Assessee. On its part it gave the full details to the AO including the FIR number reporting the loss of records d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates