9911796707
TMI Blog1996 (4) TMI 522X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ment of the High Court of Karnataka made on October 27, 1994 in Election Petition No.3 of 1991. The appellant had filed his nomination as a Scheduled Caste candidate to the Bidar-1 (SC) Parliamentary Constituency for the 9th Lok Sabha on April 26, 1991. It was rejected by the Returning Officer by his proceedings dated April 27, 1991 finding that he is a Verrashiva Jangamma and that, therefore, he ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... would do. Consequently, the appellant cannot be denied of the status as a Beda Jangamma. He also sought to place strong reliance on the judgment of the civil Court, Ex P-14, in Misc.No.75 of 1987, made on February 26, 1988 in which the Appellant therein was held to be Beda Jangamma and that, therefore, the findings of the High Court are incorrect. Having considered the evidence, we find that there ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nonymous names of castes claimed by the party is conformable to the names specified in the Presidential Notification issued under Article 341 of the Constitution. The finding recorded by the High Court after exhaustive consideration of evidence including the judgment of the civil Court on which strong reliance was placed, is that the appellant is a Veerashiva Lingayath Jangamma and that, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in Gulbarga District. That question was gone into and it was found that there were Beda Jangammas in Gulbarga District. On that basis, the decision was given by the civil Court. The foundation on which the appellant claimed the status was the certificate issued by the Assistant Municipal Commissioner that he is Beda Jangamma. The High Court found that the Assistant Commissioner has no jurisdictio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
