9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (9) TMI 249X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... I. GOKULRAJ L. AND SHRI. VIPIN P. For The Respondents : SRI. S. MANU, CGC, DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE KERALA REGIONAL UNIT R2 BY SRI. P. R. SREEJITH, SC, CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS JUDGMENT Heard Adv. Sri. Anil D. Nair, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri. S. Manu, the learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent and Sri. P. R. Sreejith, the learned Standing Cou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he matter and by denying fair and reasonable opportunity, the rights of the petitioner are prejudicially affected. The petitioner in the instant writ petition does not get into the merits of the omissions allegedly noted by the respondent or any conclusions recorded in this behalf. 3. At the request of Sri. P. R. Sreejith on 27. 08. 2019, the writ petition is directed to be listed today to enabl ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed that the order in Ext. P8 could be set aside as violative of principles of natural justice and restore the matter back to the file of the second respondent for disposal in accordance with law. 6. Adv. Sri. Anil D. Nair, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would file reply together with documents on which the petitioner intends to rely upon on or before 10. 09. 2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
