TMI Blog2019 (3) TMI 1642X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rier which is not the fact. However, such issue cannot be decided by the Adjudicating Authority as the question of return of fabrics is subsequent to that of the pre-existing dispute communicated by WhatsApp message on 4th November, 2017. Such being the position, the Adjudicating Authority having noticed the pre-existing dispute rightly rejected the application under Section 9 of the I B Code. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sfied with the grounds, the delay of 12 days in preferring the appeal is condoned. 2. From the record and the impugned order we find that the demand Notice under Section 8(1) was issued on 29th January, 2018 but much prior to the same by WhatsApp message dated 4th December, 2017, the respondent M/s. In-Time Garments Private Limited (Corporate Debtor) intimated the appellants that the fa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|