9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (10) TMI 574X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t no.2/complainant without any protest - HELD THAT:- Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the poor financial condition of the petitioner, I hereby allow the present petition. As per the guidelines enshrined in decision rendered in DAMODAR S. PRABHU VERSUS SAYED BABALAL H. [ 2010 (5) TMI 380 - SUPREME COURT] , the petitioners are required to pay 10% of the cheque amo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ma Courts, Delhi, in C.A. Bearing No. 70/2019, title as Ram Lakhan Sharma Versus Rambeer Singh and judgment dated 06.06.2019 and order on sentence dated 28.06.2019, passed by Sh. Devender Kumar Garg, Ld. CMM, North-East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in complaint case bearing no. 179/2016, under section 138 of NI Act. 4. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner/convict requested ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... itioner to pay an amount of ₹ 4,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 9% p.a. from 21.07.2016. He further suffered SI for 6 months and a sum of ₹ 5,000/- and imposed litigation charges of ₹ 5,000/- vide order dated 28.06.2019. 5. Being aggrieved, the petitioner appealed before the Appellate Court and the same was also dismissed on 04.10.2019. 6. The present peti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd submits that he has no objection if the present petition is allowed. 9. Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the poor financial condition of the petitioner, I hereby allow the present petition. 10. In addition to above, as per the guidelines enshrined in decision rendered in Damodar S.Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal H, (2010) 5 SCC 663 by the Hon ble Supre ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
