1993 (9) TMI 69

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 4B, becomes the order of the latter and, subsequently, ceases to be reviewable by the Commissioner under section 263 of the Act ?" The assessee is an individual. The assessment year involved in this reference is 1973-74. The assessment of the assessee for this assessment year was completed by the Income-tax Officer on September 8, 1976, under section 143(3) read with section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"). However, the Commissioner of Income-tax, on perusal of the record of the assessment proceedings of the assessee for the above assessment year, noticed that in computing the income of the assessee, the Income tax Officer had wrongly allowed deduction of a sum of Rs. 65,000. He, therefore, initiated proceedings under section .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ance of the Revenue. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Section 263 of the Act empowers the Commissioner to call for and examine the records of any proceeding under the Act and if he considers that any order passed therein by the Income-tax Officer is erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, he may, after giving the assessee an opportunity of being heard, pass such orders thereon as the circumstances of the case justify, including an order enhancing or modifying the assessment, or cancelling the assessment and directing a fresh assessment. The revisional power of the Commissioner is thus restricted only to orders passed by the Income-tax Officer. The question that arises for consideration is wh .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... mited v. Second. ITO [1994] 207 ITR 213. (Income-tax Reference No. 300 of 1981 decided by the Nagpur Bench on September 9, 1992): "Only because the procedure under section 144B was followed, the order does not cease to be one under section 143(3)." Section 144B, though inserted as an independent section, in truth and substance, is in the nature of a proviso to section 143(3) of the Act and should be read as such (CIT v. V. D. Saraf (HUF) [1994] 207 ITR 217 (Bom)-Income-tax Reference No. 315 of 1979 decided by the Nagpur Bench on September 29, 1992). Having regard to the foregoing discussion, we are of the clear opinion that an order passed by the Income-tax Officer under section 143(3) of the Act read with section 144B of the Act is a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X