2019 (11) TMI 561

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... gh, Superintendent Authorised Representative for the Respondent ORDER PER: ANIL G. SHAKKARWAR After hearing both the sides duly represented by Shri Ashish Kumar Shukla learned Advocate for the appellant and Shri Pawan Kumar Singh learned Superintendent A.R. for revenue, I note that there are two issues in dispute in the present appeal, I will take them up separately. 2. First dispute is relate .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed in the month of August, 2012. Revenue has objected to the said adjustment and confirmed the demand with interest and penalty, stating that the said adjustment should have not been implemented in the subsequent month or quarter as the case may be, as provided in the Service Tax Rules, 1994. 3.2 I find that the issue is no more res-integra and stands settled by this Tribunal's decision in the ca .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X