9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (11) TMI 856X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is appeal has been filed by the assessee against impugned appellate order dated 16.01.2017 of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-39, New Delhi. The grounds of appeal are as under:- 1. The learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming the disallowance of ₹ 237.81 lacs on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR for Short) by AO, the CSR expenses incurred under the directions of BPE Govt. of India requiring Companies to spend a prescribed percentage of its profits on CSR and now also made mandatory under the Companies Act. 2. That the above grounds are independent and without prejudice to each other. [B]. The only issue in dispute in this present appeal is regarding the allowability of the claim of the assessee for expenditure amounting to ₹ 237.80,958/- on account of Corporate Social Responsibility ( CSR for short ). During appellate proceedings in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT, for short ), the following particulars were filed from the assessee s side: 1. Tribunal Order dated 29.11.2018 in ITA No. 4733/Del/2015, for 1-6 AY 2012-13 holding CSR expenditure are allowable till AY 2014-15 (inclusive) and allowing Bank Guarantee Commission. 2. Tribunal Order dated 27.04 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rt of the Companies Act 2013 and extended to all companies. Accordingly, the company had incurred expenditure for development of area surrounding plants of the company and it indirectly adding to business of the company, since developed area in and business place always contribute to business of company. 4.3 The reply of the assessee has been duly considered, but it was not found to be acceptable. The assessee company is engaged in the business of production of thermal power. The contention of the assessee is that expenditure incurred in respect of community development and corporate social responsibility expenditure were covered u/s 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, the main requirement of the provision of section 37(1) is that expenditure should have been laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the business. The nexus between the expenditure and the business, in connection which expenditure has been incurred, has to be established before the assessee gets entitled to deduction under section 37(1) of the Act. It is duty of the assessee to discharge its onus in respect of expenditure incurred but the assessee failed to establish that these expenses have been in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Act (for e.g. Section 35AC, Section 80G, etc.) provide for allowing such expenditures as deduction, subject to fulfillment of conditions therein. Finally, it is observed from the nature of the expenditures claimed above that the requirement u/s 37(1) is hardly fulfilled in respect of the aforementioned expenditures. Accordingly, as the expenditure is claimed to be under CSR and yet there is a claim of deduction thereof in the P L account as any other expenditure incurred to be wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business (except capital and personal expenses), I am inclined to uphold the disallowance made on this issue in the impugned order. The appeal on this point fails. [E] As mentioned earlier, both sides have agreed before us at the time of hearing that the dispute regarding allowability of CSR expenses is covered in favour of the assessee by aforesaid orders dated 27.4.2018 and 29.11.2018 in assessee s own case, in identical facts and circumstances, in assessee s favour. Neither side has brought any distinguishable facts nor circumstances to our attention to persuade us to take a view different from the view take in the aforesaid orders dated 27.4.2018 and 29.11.2018 o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as revenue expenditure. Accordingly, we set aside the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A) on this issue and direct the Assessing Officer to allow the expenses incurred towards corporate social responsibility and accordingly, expenses incurred towards corporate social responsibility incurred prior to this date will necessarily be. ITA No. 4733/Del/2015 2. Coming to ground no. 2 of the assessee s appeal which challenges the expenses incurred towards corporate social responsibility, we find that the Raipur Bench of ITAT in the case of AC1T vs. Jindal Power Ltd. In ITA No. 99/Del/2012 has allowed CSR expenses in assessment year 2008-09. The Raipur Bench has further held that Explanation (2) to section 37 of the Act, inserted by Finance Act, 2012 has been brought into the Statute w.e.f. 1.4.2013 and this amendment is prospective in nature and accordingly prior to 1.4.2013, CSR expenses are revenue in nature and allowable. We have gone through the details of CSR expenditure incurred by the assessee during the year under consideration i.e. assessment year 2011-12 and we find that the expenses have been incurred in respect of tree plantation/environment protection, construction ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
