Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1993 (3) TMI 49

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nvolving substantial expenditure thereon. For the assessment year 1972-73, the assessee-company had claimed weighted deduction under section 35B of the Act in respect of an amount of Rs. 58,408, which represented foreign travel expenses including cost of gift articles distributed to foreign travel agents abroad, cost of travel folders for distribution abroad and membership subscription of certain travel associations. The claim of the assessee was allowed by the Income-tax Officer (the "Income-tax Officer"). The Commissioner of Income-tax (the "Commissioner"), however, called for the assessment records of the assessee for the year in question and, on a perusal of the same, felt that the Income-tax Officer had erroneously allowed deduction .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ot approve of the order of the Commissioner passed under section 263 of the Act whereby the Income-tax Officer was directed to make a fresh scrutiny of the expenditure and decide the claim for deduction afresh. In that view of the matter, the Tribunal set aside the revisional order of the Commissioner and restored the relief originally granted by the Income-tax Officer to the assessee. At the instance of the Revenue, the following two questions were proposed to be referred to this court for opinion : "(1) Whether the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the services rendered by the assessee by way of conducting and making arrangements for tours in India of foreign tourists rendered in India, the assessee is entitled to the weighted d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ircumstances, the only question before us is question No. 1. The result of the refusal of the Tribunal to refer the second question is that its decision setting aside the order of the Commissioner under section 263 of the Act has become final. The order of the Income-tax Officer got restored. The Tribunal has also made this position clear in its order by specifically stating: "We set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax and restore the relief originally granted to the assessee. " The first question referred to us, therefore, has become academic. In such a situation, we decline to answer the first question which is the only question referred to us, the same being academic. Under the facts and circumstances of the case, we ma .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates