Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (12) TMI 571

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ident from the records as well as the impugned order that the appellant had mis-declared the quantity of goods and had imported goods in excess of what was declared in the Bills of Entry and the other documents. Country of origin certificate from Bangladesh (SAFTA certificate) which would entitle them to import goods under an exemption also covered such quantity of the goods as was declared in their Bills of Entry. What is in violation of the Customs Act is only the excess quantity of the goods which have been imported by them without declaring in any of the documents. These goods are also not covered by the SAFTA certificate. Confiscation of goods - HELD THAT:- A plain reading of section 111 (e) and (l) shows that these apply to such goods .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tion. The Bills of Entry were assessed and during examination it was found that the appellants had imported goods in excess of what were declared in the Bills of Entry and other documents. The goods imported from Bangladesh are exempted from payment of duty as per the South Asia Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA) by Notification No.99/2011-CUS dated 09.11.2011. The details of the goods which were declared and actually found in respect of M/s.Bishal Exports are as follows:- Considering 1 US$ = ₹ 69.65 Sl. No. Description of Goods/CTH Quantity in pcs Declared Value/Pcs. Enhanced value/Pcs. Total Value in Rs. 01 Men's trousers Cotton [62034200] 7560 0.80 US$ 1.85 US$ 7560 X 1.85 X 69.65 = ₹ 9,74,124.90 02 Trouser kids Cot .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tion to redeem the goods on payment of redemption fine under section 125 of the Customs Act. He demanded Customs duty on the entire amount of quantity of goods which were imported along with the appropriate interest. Further, he has imposed penalties under section 112 of the Customs Act. Further he also imposed a penalty upon the Customs broker for not performing his responsibilities under section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962. 5. Aggrieved by the impugned orders, the present appeals have been filed. 6. Learned Counsel for the appellants would argue that the goods which they have imported were covered by the SAFTA Certificate which they have produced before the learned adjudicating authority. Only a few goods were found to be in excess of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n the remaining goods which conformed to the SAFTA certificate, they are entitled to the benefit of exemption Notification. Such goods which are covered by their declarations are also not liable for confiscation and no redemption fine can be imposed on those goods. Similarly penalties, if any imposed have to be reckoned only on such quantity of goods as are in excess. 9. He would further argue that the excess quantity which has been discovered during examination by the Customs is a small fraction of the total quantity imported amounting for less than 10% in terms of the total number of pieces. As the excess quantity is very small, the same may also be condoned and the entire confiscation proceedings as well as confirmation of demands may b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hority has found that the goods in question do not conform to the declarations made in the entry made under the Customs Act, i.e. the Bill of Entry and hence held the goods liable for confiscation under section 111(e) and under section 111(l) of the Customs Act, 1962. 15. A plain reading of section 111 (e) and (l) shows that these apply to such goods only which have been concealed and have not been declared and not the entire quantity of goods. In fact section 111(l) is very categorical that it applies to goods found in excess of what have been declared. Therefore, we find that excess goods are liable for confiscation and not the entire consignment imported by the appellant. We therefore find that only the following goods are liable for co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates