2020 (1) TMI 552

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the light of the aforesaid submissions, the questions of law framed above are answered in favour of the appellant. We, therefore, dispose of this appeal by directing the Tribunal to hear the appeal of the appellant, pending before it. List on 28.01.2020 before the Tribunal. Till then, no coercive steps be taken against the appellant, for recovery of the tax demand. - ITA 1017/2019 - - - Date .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... assessee is aggrieved by the Nil arm s length pricing fixed by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) in respect of its transaction with its associated enterprise. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant has placed reliance on the decision of this Court in ITA 475/2012 in Commissioner of Income Tax-I v. M/s Cushman And Wakefield India (Pvt.) Ltd., decided on 23.05.2014 to submit that the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cumstances of the case and under law, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has erred in law is rejecting the application for the stay of demand as well as the request for early hearing of the case made by the Appellant? B. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) erred in holding that the Appellant could not prove her case for grant of early hearing? 8. In the ligh .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X