1992 (2) TMI 18

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nch. The assessee is a partnership firm running a restaurant and the assessment year under reference is 1970-71. In the course of the income-tax assessment for the assessment year under reference, the Income-tax Officer, on scrutiny of the cash book, found that the assessee had tampered with the figures. The assessee had disclosed total sales at Rs. 2,67,748. The Income-tax Officer, however, aft .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r levied penalty of Rs. 55,000 in respect of the income concealed. The assessee preferred an appeal against the levy of penalty before the Tribunal. The Tribunal was of the view that penalty was leviable only in respect of the understatement of sales. In this view of the matter, it reduced the penalty to Rs. 37,000, as against Rs. 55,000 imposed by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner. It is in t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X