2020 (2) TMI 727

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... been made out by the petitioner with regard to the error apparent on the face of record and perversity in the proceeding. Hence this writ petition is entertained, for the limited purpose for consideration of the validity of the notice under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It also appears that the petitioner has preferred an appeal against the assessment order as also the demand noti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in accordance with law. - WPA 246 of 2020 - - - Dated:- 28-1-2020 - SHAMPA SARKAR, J. Dr. Navin Barik and Mr. Arup Ratan Chowdhury Mr. P. Palchowdhury for the petitioner Mr. Anirban Banerjee for the respondent no.3 Despite service none appears on behalf of the Income Tax authorities and also other Bank authorities except IDBI Bank. The petitioner has challenged the notice unde .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he demand. A prima facie case has been made out by the petitioner with regard to the error apparent on the face of record and perversity in the proceeding. Hence this writ petition is entertained, for the limited purpose for consideration of the validity of the notice under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It also appears that the petitioner has preferred an appeal against the assess .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X