1983 (10) TMI 294

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 8 which decision was given on 7-10-1981. 2. The prescribed period of limitation for filing such a petition is sixth days. It is the case of the applicant that there is a delay of 54 days which is sought to be condoned. As against the prescribed period of limitation, the period of delay sought to be condoned is comparatively large. 3. However, even larger delay would be required to be condone .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o. 444 of 1978 a large amount was involved but the merit of the decision or the importance of the proceeding or the stake involved can hardly have any relevance on the question of condonation of delay. 4. We have also ascertained as a matter of practice and rules that as far as the Original Side is concerned it was unnecessary for the applicant to have his hand a certified copy of the judgment .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... k late i.e. on 2-8-1982. It is thus clear that on the day on which the Leave Petition was filed, the application was not aware that he was beyond time by over 50 days. 6. In our opinion, when the totality of circumstances considered, no cause is made out for condonation of delay of this magnitude. 7. In the result, the notice of motion must fail and will stand dismissed with costs. 8. The .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X