2016 (3) TMI 1375

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 9;BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For the Petitioner :Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG, Mr. Rishabh Jain, Adv., Ms. Kaanan Gupta, Adv., Mr. Karan Seth, Adv., Mr. Sanchit Kumar, Adv., Mr. Binu Tamta, Adv., Ms. Madhavi Diwan, Adv., Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv., Ms. Nidhi Khanna, Adv., Mr. Kartik Seth, Adv., Ms. Kumud Lata Das, Adv., Mr. Anand S .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s been raised for determination by this Court is whether the Bar Council of India is competent to prescribe an examination post enrollment of an advocate as a condition of eligibility for his continuing to practice at the Bar. An incident question that arises is whether pre-enrollment training in terms of the Bar Council Training Rules, 1995 framed under Section 24(3)(d) of the Advocates Act, 1961 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... h of this Court. We accordingly refer this matter to a five-Judge Bench for consideration and determining of the following three questions:- (1) Whether Pre-enrollment training in terms of Bar Council of India Training Rules, 1995 framed under Section 24(3)(d) of the Advocates Act, 1961 could be validly prescribed by the Bar Council of India and if so whether the decision of this Court in Sudee .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X