9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (3) TMI 1375X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... fecting the legal profession in general and need to be authoritatively answered by a Constitution Bench of this Court. The matter is referred to a five-Judge Bench for consideration for determining the following questions: (1) Whether Pre-enrollment training in terms of Bar Council of India Training Rules, 1995 framed under Section 24(3)(d) of the Advocates Act, 1961 could be validly prescri ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For the Petitioner :Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG, Mr. Rishabh Jain, Adv., Ms. Kaanan Gupta, Adv., Mr. Karan Seth, Adv., Mr. Sanchit Kumar, Adv., Mr. Binu Tamta, Adv., Ms. Madhavi Diwan, Adv., Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv., Ms. Nidhi Khanna, Adv., Mr. Kartik Seth, Adv., Ms. Kumud Lata Das, Adv., Mr. Anand Sanjay M. Nuli, Adv., Mr. Dharm Singh ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ermination by this Court is whether the Bar Council of India is competent to prescribe an examination post enrollment of an advocate as a condition of eligibility for his continuing to practice at the Bar. An incident question that arises is whether pre-enrollment training in terms of the Bar Council Training Rules, 1995 framed under Section 24(3)(d) of the Advocates Act, 1961 is within the compet ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... accordingly refer this matter to a five-Judge Bench for consideration and determining of the following three questions:- (1) Whether Pre-enrollment training in terms of Bar Council of India Training Rules, 1995 framed under Section 24(3)(d) of the Advocates Act, 1961 could be validly prescribed by the Bar Council of India and if so whether the decision of this Court in Sudeer vs. Bar Counci ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
