2006 (1) TMI 659

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... JUDGMENT Radhakrishnan. Heard counsel on either side. 2. The Original Petition was preferred by the first respondent herein seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Exts.P4 and P6 demands and for a declaration that the petitioner is not liable to pay additional cost recovery charges on account of revision of pay of Customs personnel pursuant to Vth Pay Commission report. Ext. P2 is th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ted there is no clause obliging the petitioner to meet the additional burden due to revision of pay. In such the circumstances the learned single judge took the view that the petitioner is not obliged to meet the revision of pay on the basis of Vth pay commission report. We find no infirmity in the view taken by the learned single judge. In these circumstances we find no reason to interfere with t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X