9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (5) TMI 125X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r the applicant to make good his case that the show cause notice, issued in Form GST-MOV-10, deserves to be discharged. Application disposed off. - R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9170 of 2019 - - - Dated:- 29-1-2020 - HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA AND HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA MR MAULIK VAKHARIYA FOR THE PETITIONER GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR THE RESPONDENT ORAL JUDGMENT PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr.Chintan Dave, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the foll ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... urt to the effect that the petitioner shall make good the deficit liability, if any, as may be determined finally by the authorities for the goods as well as for the vehicle/s subject to the petitioner s right to challenge the same in accordance with law. For release of the goods and the vehicle/s, the petitioner shall also submit before the concerned authority proof of payment of above referred amounts and also a copy of the solemn undertaking filed in this court as well as documents, namely, PAN card and Aadhar card / Election card for identification of the petitioner and address of the petitioner. 4. Stand over to 19th June, 2019. Direct service is permitted. 4. While issuing notice, this Court directed that the vehicle as we ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , as the case may be, should not be confiscated. Once such a notice under Section 130 of the Act is issued right at the inception, I.e, right at the time of detention and seizure, then the provisions of Section 129 of the Act pale into insignificance. The reason why we are saying so is that for the purpose of release of the goods and conveyance detained while in transit for the contravention of the provisions of the Act or the rules, the section provides for release of such goods and conveyance on payment of the applicable tax and penalty or upon furnishing a security equivalent to the amount payable under clause (a) or clause (b) to Clause (1) of Section 129. Section 129(2) also provides that the provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 67 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ies to examine closely is whether such contravention of the provisions of the Act or the Rules was with an intent to evade the payment of tax. Section 135 of the Act provides for presumption of culpable mental state but such presumption is available to the department only in the cases of prosecution and not for the purpose of Section 130 of the Act. What we are trying to convey is that in a given case, the contravention may be quite trivial or may not be of such a magnitude which by itself would be sufficient to take the view that the contravention was with the necessary intent to evade payment of tax. 102. In such circumstances, referred to above, we propose to take the view that in all cases, without any application of mind and with ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... We have also come across notices of confiscation, wherein it has been stated that the the driver of the conveyance is presumed to have contravened the provisions of the Act or the Rules with an intent to evade payment of tax. This, in our opinion, is not justified. The resultant effect of such issue of confiscation notice at the very threshold, without any application of mind or without there being any foundation for the same, renders Section 129 of the Act practically otiose. We take cognizance of the fact that once the notice under Section 130 of the Act is issued, then the vehicle is not released even if the owner of the goods is ready and willing to pay the tax and the penalty that may be determined under Section 129 of the Act. Such a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d such reasons recorded in writing should, thereafter, be looked into by the superior authority so that the superior authority can take an appropriate decision whether the case is one of straightway invoking Section 130 of the Act. Any opinion of the authority to be formed is not subject to objective test. The language of Section 130 of the Act leaves no room for the relevance of an official examination as to the sufficiency of the ground on which the authority may act or proceed for the purpose of confiscation at the very threshold. But, at the same time, there must be material based on which alone the authority could form its opinion in good faith that it has become necessary to call upon the owner of the goods as well as the owner of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
