9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (12) TMI 1764X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... SR.ADVOCAT, MR.S.M.AKHTAR, ADVOCATE For the Respondent : MR.SOMNATH GANGULI, MS.MANASI MUKHERJEE, ADVOCATE, MR.KAUSHIK DEY, ADVOCATE ORDER The Court :-The appellant/writ petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 15th November, 2017 by which the writ petition was dismissed. Mr. Khaitan, learned senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits, the goods are imported consignments lying ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d by the authorities calls for invocation of clause (a) in that section and there should be an order for warehousing of the goods pending clearance on completion of investigation. He hands up copy of letter dated 4th December, 2017 addressed to his clients by which the respondent no.1 rejected the previous application for provisional release of the goods on the ground that the importer firm was a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... es his submissions, recorded in the impugned order, on the basis of which the writ petition was dismissed. The submissions are as under :- "It is argued that the detention of the goods is still under investigation and the investigation is not being attended by the real owners but, through their so-called authorised representative. It is further argued that the provisional release, as contemplate ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... oods under section 49(a). Mr. Dey submits that there be a direction upon the appellant/writ petitioner to co-operate in the investigation. Mr. Khaitan assures this Court that his clients will co-operate in the investigation and present themselves as and when summoned. We have dealt with the stay application and there is no necessity to keep the appeal pending. On behalf of the respondents servic ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
