Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (12) TMI 1300

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ika Bajpai, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr.Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms.Anubha Bhardwaj, Mr.Abhishek Yadav & Mr.Jatin Teotia, Advs. ORDER 1. The grievance of the petitioners is that while making allocation of Calcined Pet Coke for Aluminium Industry and Raw Pet Coke (RPC) for CPC manufacturing, to be allotted in pursuance of the Public Notice No. 81 dated 22.03.2019, the respondent no. 1 has co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ing for an increase in the annual import limit of RPC beyond 1.4 million MT. This application of the petitioner was rejected by the Supreme Court by its order dated 28.01.2019, observing as under:- "The order dated 09.10.2018 passed by this Court is clear. This court has set the outer limit for import of raw pet coke cannot exceed 1.4 MT per annum in total. In view of the aforesaid, prayers ma .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... esent petition, the petitioner filed an application, being IA No. 73242/2019, before the Supreme Court inter alia praying for permission for the petitioner to challenge the Minutes of Meeting dated 22.04.2019 of the respondent no. 1 regarding allocation. The said application was disposed of by the Supreme Court observing as under:- "Our order is clear. No further clarification is required. This .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... stalled capacity as on 09.10.2018 has to be considered by the respondent no. 1 for making allocation of RPC. The Minutes, however, do not show the consideration of documents that have been referred to hereinabove by the leaned senior counsel for the petitioners, by the respondent no. 1 while making such allocation. 8. In light of the above facts, the respondent no. 1 is directed to consider the p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates