Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2020 (6) TMI 410

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... director of M/s Index Securities and Research Pvt Ltd alongwith major share holder Shri Sant Lal Aggarwal appeared before the Assessing Officer. Financials were available with the Assessing Officer. AO/CIT(A) should not have discarded the evidences. In our considered opinion, the assessee has successfully discharged the onus cast upon it u/s 68. Addition u/s 69C - Addition is directly related to the loan amount as the same is interest paid by the assessee to the company and the same is also directed to be deleted. Before closing, it can be seen from the confirmation exhibited elsewhere that the loan was taken on 11.09.2009 and within three months, the loan was repaid. All the transactions have been done through banking channel. Cash loans given to the assessee - Foundation of the impugned addition is the statement of Shri Devi Das Tikamdas Chattani. Except for that, there is no direct evidence brought on record to show that any cash transactions took place between the assessee and the said person. Assessing Officer never confronted Shri Devi Das Tikamdas Chattani to Shri Sant Lal Aggarwal. If the statement of Shri Devi Das Tikamdas Chattani is to be believed, then on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... It also came to the knowledge of the Revenue that there were several beneficiaries. Statement of one Shri Devi Das Tikamdas was recorded u/s 131A r.w.s 131 of the Act on 25th and 26th September, 2015. 6. In his statement, Shri Devi Das Tikamdas Chattani stated that whole of the loan account was maintained by one Shri Popat Lal Vani. Shri Devi Das Tikamdas Chattani also stated that one Shri Sant Lal Aggarwal was handler of ₹ 200 crores at Delhi from where the loan was disbursed to around 100 parties, out of which 60 such parties were transacted through Shri Sant Lal Aggarwal. 7. The Assessing Officer of the assessee was informed by the Investigation Wing of the department that from verification of documents seized, it clearly appears that Shri Sant Lal Aggarwal received cash loans from Shri Asharam and further disbursed to other parties and the assessee is one of the beneficiaries. According to the Assessing Officer, the following cash loans were given to the assessee: Date Beneficiary Name Debit Credit Group Contra 01.07.2009 Shagun Jewel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... essee did not find any favour with the Assessing Officer who concluded by making addition of ₹ 2 crores as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act. 12. The entire addition is based upon the statement of Shri Devi Das Tikamdas Chattani. The Assessing Officer was of the firm belief that the assessee is one of the entities who has received credits amounting to ₹ 2 crores and is one of the beneficiaries of accommodation entries from M/s Index Securities and Research Pvt Ltd. According to the Assessing Officer, the assessee has routed its unexplained income through M/s Index Securities and Research Pvt Ltd. While making additions, the Assessing Officer drew support from the statement of Shri Vinod Kumar Taneja and Shri Chanchal Taneja who are directors of M/s Index Securities and Research Pvt Ltd. 13. According to the Assessing Officer, both the directors did not have any knowledge about the financials of M/s Index Securities and Research Pvt Ltd. The Assessing Officer observed that M/s Index Securities and Research Pvt Ltd is not doing any business activity in reality and is merely a paper entity. 14. As mentioned elsewhere, the assessee has furnished complete de .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he assessee has successfully established the identity, genuineness of the transaction and capacity of the company M/s Index Securities and Research Pvt Ltd. 22. These direct and clinching evidences cannot be brushed aside lightly. The entire additions have been made on surmises and assumptions revolving around the statement of one Shri Devi Das Tikamdas Chattani ignoring the fact that the director of M/s Index Securities and Research Pvt Ltd alongwith major share holder Shri Sant Lal Aggarwal appeared before the Assessing Officer. Financials were available with the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer/CIT(A) should not have discarded the evidences. In our considered opinion, the assessee has successfully discharged the onus cast upon it u/s 68 of the Act. We, accordingly, do not find any merit in the addition of ₹ 2 crores and the same is hereby deleted. 23. Addition of ₹ 5,40,000/- u/s 69C is directly related to the loan amount of ₹ 2 crores as the same is interest paid by the assessee to the company and the same is also directed to be deleted. 24. Before closing, it can be seen from the confirmation exhibited elsewhere that the loan was taken on 11. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion has been made on surmises and conjectures. The relevant para of the assessment order reads as under: From above it is clear that M/s. Shagun Jewellers has had transactions with M/s Index Securities Research Put Ltd which was a conduit company managed by Mr.Santlal Aggarwal who has further acted on behalf of Sh. Asharam Bapu. Hence, it cannot be ruled out that cash loan were received by the assessee from Santlal Aggarwal. Moreover, the seized material retrieved , clearly indicates that the assessee company has paid ₹ 1,55,16,090/- in cash on account of interest on such cash loan. 29. Considering the facts of the case in hand, in the light of statement of Shri Sant Lal Aggarwal, we do not find any merit in the impugned addition and the same is directed to be deleted. Accordingly, Ground Nos. 4 and 5 are allowed. 30. Ground No. 7 relates to levy of interest u/s 234B of the Act. Levy of interest is mandatory, though consequential. The Assessing Officer is directed to recompute interest as per provisions of law. 31. In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No. 9890/DEL/2019 is partly allowed. The order is pronounced in the open court on 16.06.202 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates