9911796707
TMI Blog1970 (8) TMI 101X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... at building. That is mentioned in Ex. P-1 mortgage. What is now claimed is that prior to the mortgage they were living in the property as Kudikidappukars and on redemption their Kudikidappu right will revive and if so decree for redemption must be passed subject to that right. The only contention urged before the courts below in answer to the claim of the defendants was that the building in the suit property was constructed at a cost of more than ₹ 400/- and therefore it would not be a hut within the meaning of Explanation II to S. 2(25) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act 1 of 1964. The commissioner valued the building at ₹ 515.35. According to the defendants this value was excessive and it ought to have been found to be less than & ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ho has neither homestead nor any land exceeding in extent three cents in any city or major municipality or five cents in any panchayat area or township, in possession either as owner or as tenant, on which he could erect a homestead and-- (a) who has been permitted with or without an obligation to pay rent by a person in lawful possession of any land to have the use and occupation of a portion of such land for the purpose of erecting a homestead; or (b) who has been permitted by a person in lawful possession of any land to occupy, with or without an obligation to pay rent, a hut belonging to such person and situate in the said land; and the kudikidappu means the land and the homestead or the hut so permitted to be erected or occupie ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... me of redemption no other homestead or any land exceeding three cents in any city or major municipality or five cents in any other municipality or ten cents in any panchayat area or township, in possession either as owner or as tenant, on which he could erect a homestead. It is mainly on the language of Explanation III that the learned counsel for the respondent relies to meet the case of the appellant. According to him it is only where a kudikidappukaran secures any mortgage with possession of the 'land' in which the kudikidappu is situate that the Explanation will have application. If the mortgage be of the property with the building thereon which comes within the definition of hut in Explanation II it will not attract Explanat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mprehending all things of a permanent and substantial nature, and even of an unsubstantial, provided they be permanent. Reynard v. City of Caldwell (55 Idaho 342, 42 P. 2d. 292, 296). In Black's Law Dictionary in considering the meaning of the term land , it is said: Land includes not only the soil or earth, but also things of a permanent nature affixed thereto or found therein, whether by nature, as water, trees, grass, herbage, other natural or perennial products, growing crops or trees, mineral under the surface, or by the hand of man, as buildings, fixtures, fences, bridges, as well as works constructed for use of water, such as dikes, canals, etc. Reynard v. City of Caldwell, 55 Idaho 342, 42 P. 2d 292, 296; City of Howpor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... xtension of the term land , but that they are so connected with it that by rules of law they pass by a conveyance of the land. This view makes land though it would allow an instrument speaking of land to operate coextensively with one granting really or real property by either of those terms. But many of the authorities use the expression land as including these incidents to the soil. Abbot. It is seen that in many enactments in England the term land was defined as including building. No doubt, this is by statutory definition. But this would indicate that the concept of land as inclusive of building is nothing new. I need refer only to such definition of 'Land' in the Interpretation Act 1850, Interpretation Act 1889, Conve ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... standing thereon. The only other contention is that the term 'kudikidappu' in Explanation III must be read as defined in the Act on the date of its commencement and not in the light of subsequent amendments. I do not see the justification in applying the definition in an enactment as it stood at the time the Act came into force ignoring the amendments to the enactment which have come into force from time to time. Certainly it is not the case of the respondent plaintiff that the definition of Kudikidappukaran must be applied with reference to the time at which the person concerned became an occupant of the hut so as to qualify him to get kudikidappu right. That would mean that the Act confers kudikidappu right only in cases where kud ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
