9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (7) TMI 689X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... me Tax Act, 1961 for deduction of tax at source at NIL rate - petitioner contends that the impugned order is contrary to the principle of rule of consistency as the 0.9% rate specified in the impugned order is higher than the 0.7% rate of tax deduction at source determined in the immediately preceding year - HELD THAT:- Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... R CM APPLs. 15374-15376/2020 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 4270/2020 CM APPL. 15373/2020 The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the Certificate dated 30th June, 2020 issued by respondent No. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. She states that the respondent while issuing the impugned certificate has placed detailed reasons on record. Since detailed reasons are stated to be available on record, the present writ petition and the pending application are disposed of with a direction to the respondent to furnish a copy of the reasons to the petitioner within a week. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
