2018 (7) TMI 2127

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tment reported to the Magistrate that though notices was issued to Selvaraj from whom the cash was seized, he did not respond to it. This was the reason for the Magistrate's dismissing the application. I think the decision is correct. But the learned counsel submits that the Magistrate may be directed to reconsider the matter on merits after hearing the petitioner and the Income Tax Department .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... No.384 of 2018 at Walayar Police Station. The cash was produced before the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction. The petitioner, who claimed to be the employer of Selvaraj, filed an application under section 451 Cr.P.C. By the impugned order the learned Magistrate dismissed it. This is challenged. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor and the learne .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X