9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (8) TMI 473X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... h to interfere with the quantum of tax to be deposited i.e., 20% disputed tax as fixed by 1st respondent in the assessment order. We are inclined to grant to petitioner four (04) more weeks time to comply with the payment of 20% of the tax demanded as per the order of the 1st respondent. Writ Petition is disposed of directing petitioner shall pay to respondents on or before 31.03.2020 a sum ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Year 2017-18 as determined in the Assessment Order dt.31.12.2019 passed by 2nd respondent and directing petitioner to pay 20% of the tax demand in two equal monthly instalments in view of the financial difficulties being faced by petitioner. 3. The counsel for petitioner contended that the Assessment Order was itself passed on the last day on which the assessment was to be completed by the 2n ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dly faced by petitioner and keeping in mind the fact that only 20% of the tax demanded was asked to be paid by 1st respondent as a condition for not enforcing the entire demanded amount as mentioned in the assessment order, we do not wish to interfere with the quantum of tax to be deposited i.e., 20% disputed tax as fixed by 1st respondent in the assessment order. 7. However, we are inclined ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
