TMI Blog2020 (9) TMI 166X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... te For the Respondent : Ms. Arti Bansal, Advocate, Mr. Gigi C. George, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2/UOI. ORDER HEARD THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING. 1. Both the petitions have been filed by the petitioners praying inter alia that the respondent No.1/Union of India and the respondent No.2/Registrar of Companies be directed not to treat them as "disqualified Directors" under the provisions o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ified Directors had been uploaded and published on the website of the respondent No.1 as long back as in September 2017. 3. The only explanation sought to be offered by Mr. Verma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners is that they were unaware of the publication of the aforesaid List till recently. He however concedes that there is no explanation offered in the petition for the delay. 4. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|