9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (9) TMI 343X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ppellant Ms. A. Aruna, Advocate for the Respondent ORDER This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the Order-in-Appeal Seaport C.Cus. II No. 731/2019 dated 18.12.2019 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-I), Chennai. 2. The only grievance of the Revenue is against the finding of the Learned First Appellate Authority as to the said authority holding that the Revenue's first appeal f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... stoms has affixed his signature on 04.02.2019 and the same appears to have been dispatched on 12.02.2019 (though written by hand but no initial by any officer as to the correction). The said Order-in-Original is also marked to the recipient viz., the Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Review Cell-II and the same contains the date of receipt as 11th March 2019. 5. The above facts are not disputed by ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ignatory of the order. Moreover, the Learned First Appellate Authority has considered the date of dispatch as 12.02.2019 whereas as per Section 129D (3) ibid., what is relevant is the date of communication i.e., Review Order to be passed within a period of three months from the date of communication. Hence, if the date of communication is 11th March 2019, then the Review Order passed on 10.06.2019 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ead to happily conclude that the fact of the above state of affairs, as explained by the Revenue, are indeed correct. Without going into any further, I reject the explanation now placed by the Revenue. 9. In the result, I do not find any merits in the contentions of the Revenue and accordingly, reject their appeal as being devoid of any merits. The cross objection filed by the assessee is also di ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
