TMI Blog2019 (11) TMI 1441X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mber (Technical) AND V.P. Singh Member (Technical) For Appellant: Shri Vardhman Kaushik, Shri Nishant Gautam and Shri Sangkrito Ray Chaudhuri, Advocates For Respondents: None ORDER Heard Counsel for the Appellant. This Appeal is arising from Impugned Order dated 19.09.2019 passed by Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Jaipur) in IA 238/JPR/2019 and IA 258/JPR/2019 in TA 78/2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t deposit of the value of the trucks already sold. By the Impugned Order, the Adjudicating Authority has directed the Appellant to deposit Rs. 25,10,000/- and then participate. The learned Counsel for the Appellant is submitting that the Appellant did not have knowledge of the initiation of CIRP process and so the fault cannot be found with the Appellant. The Counsel submits that if the Appellant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|