9911796707
TMI Blog1990 (4) TMI 305X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eals by special leave challenging the reversing common decision of the Punjab Haryana High Court holding the insurer liable for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act of 1939. 2. The insurer repudiated its liability by maintaining that the policy had been taken after the accident and, therefore, it had no liability to meet the award of compensation against the owner. The Tribunal accepted ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... decision of the Allahabad High Court in Jaddoo Singh and Anr. v. Smt. Malti Devi and Anr. asupports this view on principle. 4. There is evidence in this case that the vehicle was insured earlier upto 31.8.1984 and the same was available to be renewed but instead of obtaining renewal, a fresh insurance was taken from 28th of September, 1984, which is the date of the accident. We are inclined to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Re F B Warren [1938] Ch. 725 where it has been held that a judicial act will be referred to the first moment of the day on which it is done. A payment made by a bankrupt in the morning of a day is, therefore, not made, within Section 45 of the Bankruptcy Act, 1914 before the date of a receiving order made later in the same day. 8. The ratio of these also supports the view we have taken. 9. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
