9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (10) TMI 535X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ober 2020. - W. P. (CRL) 1631/2020 - - - Dated:- 8-10-2020 - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vijay Aggarwal , Mr. Sanjay Aggarwal, Mr. Anshul Aggarwal, Mr.Shailesh Pandey Mr.Deepanshu Choithani, Advs. For the Respondents : Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr.Dhruv Pande Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Advs. for R1/Director ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng judicial custody of the petitioner, as being in violation inter alia of section 167 of the Cr.P.C. The petitioner has also prayed for other consequential and ancillary reliefs. 2. At the outset it is submitted that respondent No. 2/NCT of Delhi is not a necessary party to the present petition and may be deleted. 3. Accordingly, let respondent No. 2 be deleted from the array of partyresp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... was thereafter detained in a lock-up, which resulted in the petitioner contracting coronavirus infection; whereupon he was initially admitted to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Jhajjar and is presently under treatment at the Apollo Hospital, New Delhi. 7. Mr. Rohatgi has made extensive submissions both on the maintainability of the present petition before this court; as also on the proced ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s the above position and submits that since the petitioner is seeking quashing of all proceedings arising from the ECIR, which was recorded in Delhi, this court would have jurisdiction in light of Article 226(2) of the Constitution; and the jurisdictional court in Mumbai does not come into the picture at all. 12. Let status report on the preliminary objection as to territorial jurisdiction be f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
