9911796707
Advanced Search 
TMI Blog2018 (9) TMI 2002X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... oner and Sri Shaik Jeelani Basha, Learned Special Standing Counsel for Commercial Taxes and, with their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. 2. The proceedings under challenge in this Writ Petition is the order passed by the second respondent on 20-8-2018, for the tax period March, 2018, directing the petitioner to pay tax and penal interest without issuing an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ty at 15%, contending that any proceedings for recovery of penalty must be preceded by a show cause notice which, admittedly, was not issued in the present case. 4. Section 74(5) of the APGST Act stipulates that a person, chargeable with tax, may, before service of notice under sub-section (1), pay the amount of tax along with interest payable under Section 50 and a penalty equivalent to 15% ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... yable thereon under Section 50, and a penalty equivalent to the tax specified in the notice. 5. While a show cause notice is required to be issued under Section 74(1) of the APGST Act for recovery of penalty equivalent to the tax specified in the notice, Section 74(5) of the said Act enables the dealer to pay 15% penalty on his own accord before receipt of a notice under Section 74(1) of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... authority to recover penalty, equivalent to the tax specified in the notice, is only after a notice is issued calling upon the petitioner to show cause why penalty should not be imposed on him. 6. The impugned order, to the limited extent the petitioner was called upon to pay penalty at 15%, is set aside. As the validity of the order is not subjected to challenge in this Writ Petition on an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
