9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (8) TMI 1573X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... vocate, the applicant/petitioner should not suffer, therefore, there are no impediment in restoring the CP(IB) No. 473 of 2018 by restoring IA No. 414 of 2019 and IA No. 176 of 2019 by condoning the delay of 38 days as prayed for in IA No. 415 of 2019. Application is restored by condoning the delay. - I.A. Nos. 414 and 415 of 2019 in I.A. No. 176 of 2019 in CP(IB) No. 473 of 2018 - - - Dated: ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... reafter, when the Petitioner came to know that the application being No. IA No. 176 of 2019 filed for restoration, was also dismissed for non-prosecution, the applicant made another application being IA No. 414 of 2019 under rule 48(2) and rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016. Since the same was not filed within a period of limitation i.e. one month, the applicant filed the instant application being IA ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f delay for restoration of IA No. 176 of 2019 in CP(IB)No. 473 of 2018. 4. Since all the Interlocutory applications are connected with each other, as such composite order is passed hereunder. 5. On perusal of the records, it is found that on all the occasions, the applications are/were dismissed for not taking steps by the advocate, as stated by the Applicant. Since it is a settled law that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (b) XXXXXXXX (c) XXXXXXXX (d) XXXXXXXX (e) XXXXXXXX (f) XXXXXXXX (g) setting aside any order of dismissal of any representation for default or any order passed by it ex parte; and (h) any other matter which may be prescribed. 6. In view of the above amendments, I am of the view that CP(IB) No. 473 of 2018 can be restored by restoring IA No. 176 of 2019 and IA No. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
