9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (11) TMI 1531X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eded that the Petitioner herein has not filed any formal application in E.O.C.Nos.35 and 34 of 2018 before the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate for the grievance now redressed - HELD THAT:- In view of the fact that no formal application has been filed before the Court concerned, this Court cannot direct the learned Magistrate to consider the request made by the Petitioner. Therefor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ecial Public Prosecutor. COMMON ORDER These Criminal Original Petitions have been filed to direct the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, E.O.-II, at Egmore, Chennai to permit and allow the Accused to cross examine the witness in E.O.C.Nos.35 and 34 of 2018 examined on the side of the prosecution before framing of charges. 2.Heard Mr.P.Ramesh Kumar, learned Counsel appear ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n E.O.C.Nos.35 and 34 of 2018. 5.The grievance of the petitioner is that immediately, after recording the chief examination of PW1, the petitioner, being the accused himself, was not given an opportunity to cross examine the witness in E.O.C.Nos.35 and 34 of 2018. In this regard, the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate refused to consider the grievance of the petitioner by saying t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... opy of this order and upon receipt of such petition, the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, E.O.II, Egmore is directed to consider the same and pass orders in accordance with law. 8.If the order passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, E.O.II, Egmore is not in favour of the Petitioner, then the Petitioner is entitled to approach this Court by way of filing ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
