Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2020 (12) TMI 1040

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 9 dated 24.12.2019 = 2019 (12) TMI 1159 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY passed by this Authority in the matter of M/s Caroa Properties LLP versus Potnoor Naveen was directed under rule 133 (5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 to conduct investigation to find out whether the Respondent had availed the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) which was required to be passed on to the eligible recipients as per the provisions of section 171 (1) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Act, 2017 in respect of two others projects namely "Golf meadows Godrej City Phase II" and "EWS". 2. The DGAP has reported that accordingly, he issued Notice to the Respondent on 08.01.2020 under Rule 129 (3) of the above Rules, calling upon hi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , Panvel" d. First Booking details of the project "Golf Meadows Godrej City, Panvel" (including Builder Buyer Agreement). e. Copy of Declaration made in Annexure-IV to the Notification No. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019. 5. The DGAP after examining the above application, various replies of the Respondent and the documents/evidence on record has stated that the main issues for determination were whether there were benefits of reduction in the rate of tax or ITC on the supply of construction service by the Respondent after implementation of the GST w.e.f. 01.07.2017 and if so, whether the Respondent had passed on such benefits to the recipients by way of commensurate reduction in prices, in terms of Section 171 of the CGST A .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... g the period 01.04.2016 to 30.06.2017 (Pre-GST) specific to Godrej City Panvel Phase-1 and had apportioned the Common Credit among all the phases, EWS and commercial project (including projects not launched yet). The DGAP has examined the issue of passing on the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax from 12% to 8% (after Land abatement) vide Notification no. 01/2018 Central Tax-Rate dated 25.01.2018 w.e.f. 25.01.2018 and observed that the above Notification was not applicable to the above projects of the Respondent since these were other than affordable projects. Further, the Respondent had made the first booking on 02.11.2018 which was after the entry into force of Notification w.e.f. 25.01.2018. 8. The DGAP has intimated that the Respo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o him and other flat buyers in compliance with this Authority's earlier order No. 78/2019 dated 24.12.2019 = 2019 (12) TMI 1159 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY. He has also attached the statement of accounts as evidence of not having received the benefit as yet. 11. This Authority has carefully examined the DGAP's Report and various submissions placed on record. The issues to be decided by the Authority are as under:- 1) Whether there was any violation of the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 in this case? 2) If yes, then what was the quantum of profiteering? 12. This Authority has observed that the submissions of Sh. Potnoor Naveen were only relevant to the proceedings relating to Respondent's project .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... any EWS unit as of 31.12.2019. The DGAP has further found that the projects "Golf Meadows Godrej City, Panvel (Phase-Il)" and "EWS" had been launched in the post-GST regime and there was no price history of the units sold in the pre-GST regime that could be compared with the post-GST base prices to establish whether there was any profiteering by the Respondent or not. In terms of the provisions of the RERA Act, bookings in the project could not happen till the registration was obtained. Since the registration was obtained for the subject projects post the introduction of Goods and Services Tax only, the provisions of Section 171 dealing with Anti-profiteering could not be made applicable to the said project in the view of the fact that the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates