9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (1) TMI 339X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... executed Exhibit P14 agreement acknowledging the liability and had entered the particulars of the cheques issued towards discharge of the liability in that document. The petitioner has not disputed his signature in the agreement. Further, the petitioner has not disputed his signature in the cheques or the amount entered in words. Therefore, as rightly found by the learned Magistrate, no purpose w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ith the complainant Company for supply of cement to the concrete mixing unit of the 1 st accused Company. The cement was supplied as per the agreement, but the accused failed to pay the price of the cement and the commission agreed upon. The dispute was later resolved and an agreement entered into between the complainant, in terms of which the petitioner acknowledged the liability and issued four ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e, all other entries in the cheque were in his handwriting and that,the amount in figures and the date was written by the petitioner. It is for disproving this fact and thereby establishing the falsity of the case set up by the complainant that the request was made to send the cheques for expert opinion. 3. The first respondent filed objection contending that the attempt is only to protract the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ing up rebuttal evidence. 6. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that the petitioner had executed Exhibit P14 agreement acknowledging the liability and had entered the particulars of the cheques issued towards discharge of the liability in that document. The petitioner has not disputed his signature in the agreement. Further, the petitioner has not disputed his signature in the cheques or t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
