Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1988 (9) TMI 42

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ome-tax Act"). There are in all four partners in the firm, namely, Sarva Shri Sugan Chand, Kanhiyalal, Noratmal and Vinod Kumar. At, the time, when the Income-tax Officer entered the business premises, Sugan Chand was present there. During the course of survey, account books were inspected and two lists marked "A" and "B" which are annexed to the writ petition as annexures 4 and 5, respectively, were prepared. Though it is the case of the petitioner firm that it was during the survey that the account books were seized and impounded, respondent No. 2 in his return has come out with the case that only lists "A" and "B" were prepared and thereafter, a notice under section 131(3) of the Income-tax Act was given and it was in pursuance of that n .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ring the period of 15 days and if the approval is obtained after 15 days, it will have no effect. There can be no ex post facto approval. We called upon Mr. Singhal, learned counsel for the respondents, to let us know whether before impounding the account books or other documents, any reasons for so doing were recorded by respondent No. 2 or not. So far as the order of the Income-tax Officer at page 39 of the paper book; made under section 131(3) of the Income-tax Act is concerned, a bare reading of the said order will show that it is not mentioned therein that any reasons for impounding the account books and other documents were recorded. The order reads as under : "In exercise of powers conferred upon me under section 131(3) of the Inco .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on of the mandatory provisions as aforesaid. Mr. Singhal, learned counsel for the respondents, gives out that the assessment for the assessment year 1986-87 is pending and could not be completed because even after notice given under section 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, the return was not filed. We may state that if despite notice, no return is filed, there are provisions in the Income-tax Act under which an ex parte assessment can be made. We may further state that this court had stayed proceedings on June 30, 1988. Mr. Singhal, learned counsel for the respondents, gives out that the assessment will be completed within two months. Consequently, we partly allow this writ petition and though we hold that the impounding of the account boo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates