9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (4) TMI 823X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 019 - petitioner did not pay the required amount under the scheme within the period of 30 days - HELD THAT:- According to the petitioner, he made an attempt to electronically make the said payment on 30.06.2020. Though the said amount was debited from the petitioner's account, it was subsequently re-credited. The payment process was not successful - The petitioner seems to have kept quiet the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondents. 2.The petitioner was running a Cable T.V. business. He had suffered an adverse assessment order vide order in Original No.MAD-CEX-000- ASC-021-11 dated 26.12.2011. It appears that the petitioner had earlier questioned the assessment year and there was also remand. Be that as it may, the liability of the petitioner had become final ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... #39;s account, it was subsequently re-credited. The payment process was not successful. 3.The petitioner seems to have kept quiet thereafter. Though he would state that he was approaching the respondent officials in person, vide communication dated 15.01.2021, the fourth respondent herein called upon the petitioner to clear the original liability. Thereafter, the petitioner woke up and filed th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
