1988 (1) TMI 35

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... late Tribunal, Nagpur, has referred the following two questions to this court for its opinion : " 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that section 140A(3) of the Incometax Act, 1961, is violative of article 19(1)(f) of the Constitution ? 2. Whether the Appellate Tribunal had the jurisdiction to hold that section 140A(3) is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 12, a Division Bench of this court has held that section 140A(3) of the Act cannot be held to be confiscatory and unreasonable. This court has, in taking the aforesaid view, disagreed with the view expressed by the Madras High Court to the contrary which was relied on by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The aforesaid decision of the Madras High Court was rendered in the case of A. M. Sali Marika .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X