9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (5) TMI 1552X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 6 in the interest of justice. However, on 18.05.2016 none appeared on behalf of the assessee nor any adjournment was sought by the assessee. It appears that the assessee is not interested in pursuing the appeal. In the absence of any appearance by the assessee in person or through AR inspite of service of several notices for hearing, we proceed to dispose of the appeal ex-parte qua the assessee af ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... STHY, JM AND SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, AM For the Appellant : None For the Respondent : Shri Abhijit Haldar ORDER PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, AM : The captioned appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of CIT(A)-IT/TP, Pune dated 25.11.2013 relating to assessment year 2006-07 passed under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act ). 2. At the ti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... both the sides. Fresh RPAD notice for 01.03.2016 was issued to the assessee which was duly served as per the acknowledgement card placed on record. On 01.03.2016, none appeared on behalf of the assessee and again no request for adjournment was sought on behalf of the assessee. The appeal was once again adjourned to 18.05.2016 in the interest of justice. However, on 18.05.2016 none appeared on beha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r, we are unable to decide the issue on merits. We similarly find that the grounds of appeal are argumentative and are not in conformity with Rule 8 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963. The appeal of the assessee is therefore dismissed in limine. 4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced on this 20th day of May, 2016. - - TaxTMI - TMITax ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
