9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (8) TMI 859X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... /0I/HIU/20I9 dated 25.01.2019 ECIR solely on the ground that the charge-sheet did not advert to a scheduled offence - HELD THAT:- On the previous date i.e. 08.07.2020, I had restrained the respondents from taking any precipitate action against the petitioner in pursuance of the Enforcement Case Information Report i.e. ECIR/0I/HIU/20I9 dated 25.01.2019 [ECIR] solely on the ground that the charge-sh ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... R. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER For the Petitioner : Mr. Manav Gupta, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC ORDER [Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19] 1. Though opportunities were granted on 29.06.2020 and 08.07.2020 to the respondents to file a counter-affidavit in the matter, no counter-affidavit has been filed as yet. 2. Mr. Amit Mahajan, learned CGS ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ioner has not been found as having infracted the provisions of Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [in short "IPC"], which is a scheduled offence. 5. I may only indicate that Mr. Mahajan says that since the investigation is on, there is a possibility of not only the petitioner being charged under Section 420 of the IPC, but also qua other scheduled offence(s) as well. 6. Given the aforesa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
