9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (7) TMI 252X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... AR ORDER PER RAJPAL YADAV , VICE PRESIDENT : Present miscellaneous application is directed at the instance of the Revenue pointing out an apparent error in the order of the Tribunal dated 6.12.2016 in ITA No.1520/Ahd/2013. Revenue seeks to recall of the impugned order. 2. Misc. Application is running into one-and-half pages, which reads as under: "2. In this connection, it is stated that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ay Corporation about the possession and seizure of land is factually incorrect. A person can be in possession of a land and can be having development right without there being ownership. Thus facts have not been appreciated in right perspective by the Ld. Revenue authorities." The above findings of the ITAT contradicts the fact accepted by Jay Construction (Proprietor: Naresh M Shah) during ass ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in the confirmation letter dated 2.12.2010 written by Shri Naresh M. Shah, proprietor of Jay Construction. Copy of this letter is available on page no.129 of paper book filed at the time of hearing. Thus, according to the Revenue, an error has crept in the order of the Tribunal about this fact, and therefore, this error is required to be rectified. On the other hand, the ld.counsel for the assess ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ment dated 27.6.2007 entered into between the assessee and Jay Construction. On overall appreciation of all the documents in their setting as a whole, the Tribunal has recorded a finding that Jay Corporation was having development rights. As far as the letter referred by the Revenue dated 2.12.2010 is concerned, in this letter, in para-1 the following narrations is available "we had entered into a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
