Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1984 (7) TMI 8

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Pvt. Ltd. and for a decree directing rectification of the share register of the company by inserting the plaintiff's name in respect of those shares. After the suit was instituted, a written statement was filed on behalf of the defendants. It appears that there were protracted litigations between the parties in other proceedings. But ultimately when this suit camp up for hearing, the defendants chose not to contest the suit. The propounders of the Will of Motilal Chamaria, defendants Nos. 1 and 2, were dead at the time the suit was taken up for hearing. The advocate-on-record on behalf of defendants Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6 stated in court that he had no instructions in the matter and took leave to retire from the suit. Nobody appeared on behal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... angement was confirmed by a writing on or about January 8, 1961, and that writing is set out in annexure 'A' to the plaint. Motilal Chamaria died intestate on June 22, 1967. The plaintiff's case is that after the death of Motilal, the company has not rectified the share register by inserting the name of the plaintiff as the holder of the said 900 shares nor has the company returned the share scrips to the plaintiff. The plaintiff prayed for a declaration that she was the owner of the said 900 equity shares of the defendant company as well as the direction for rectification of the share register. The plaintiff stated in her deposition that Motilal during his lifetime held 875 shares in the company in his own name ; but the other 25 shares .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as one of his heirs after his death. We are of the view that the appellant is entitled to succeed in this case. The plaintiff has amply proved that the said 900 shares were handed over to her along with a duly attested blank transfer form by her husband, Motilal, in January, 1961. She has stated that all the dividends on 900 shares thereafter were paid to her. The gift was complete as soon as the share scrips along with the transfer deed were given to the plaintiff, although the transfer was not recorded in the books of the company. There cannot be any doubt that the ownership of the shares passed to the appellant when the shares, were handed over to her along with the blank transfer form duly signed by Motilal. It was held by the Suprem .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... form duly signed by the transferor. The plaintiff has acquired a complete legal right to have the shares registered in her name. The deed of gift dated January 8, 1961, recites : "That out of natural love and affection for my wife, Smt. Sheila Devi, whom I married on April 5, 1953, I undertake to give to her the entire amount of dividend which will be declared by the East India Film Company (P) Ltd., 68, Cotton Street, Calcutta, from year to year henceforward, i.e., from January 1, 1961, in respect of all shares owned by me in my name and in benami names of others in cash irrespective of income-tax deductions, That after my death the shares mentioned above should be transferred in her name as one of my heirs, irrespective of any future .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the transfer from being valid and effective. The learned trial judge placed reliance on the case of Amarendra Krishna Dutt v. Monimunjary Debi, AIR 1921 Cal 148. But the correctness of that decision was doubted by the Supreme Court in the case of Vasudev Ramchandra Shelat v. Pranlal Jayanand Thakar [1975] 45 Comp Cas 43 (SC). The Supreme Court observed that the Calcutta High Court's view was "in conflict with the law declared in the cases cited by the appellant which we approve". The point of time at which the plaintiff lodged the share certificates with the company is quite immaterial. The plaintiff has proved that Motilal was the owner of all the shares ; 875 shares were held in his name and the other shares were held in the names .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates