TMI Blog1985 (11) TMI 34X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 961, at the instance of the Revenue to decide the following question of law, viz. : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in law, in upholding the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner allowing the provision for gratuity at Rs. 1,34,000 as an allowable expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ?" The material ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and the deduction was restored. The Revenue's appeal to the Tribunal has failed and the deduction allowed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner has been sustained. Aggrieved by the conclusion reached by the Tribunal, the Revenue sought a reference which has been made to answer the above question of law. From the statement of the case, it is clear that the deduction of Rs. 1,34,000 as provisio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|