9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (8) TMI 1533X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that the said allegations are bald and omnibus and do not make any specific reference to the role of the appellants in any alleged conspiracy. In Central Bureau of Investigation versus K. Narayana Rao [ 2013 (7) TMI 588 - SUPREME COURT ] to which one of us (Ranjan Gogoi, J.) was a party, it has been held by this Court that a criminal prosecution on the basis of such bald and omnibus statement/alle ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... urt of Patna passed in Crl. Misc. No.31533 of 2008 by which the High Court refused to quash the criminal proceedings against the appellants under Sections 403/406/420/467/471/389 read with Section 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 3. We have heard the learned counsels for the parties. 4. The High Court by the impugned judgment has refused to quash the First Information Report (FIR) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s and do not make any specific reference to the role of the appellants in any alleged conspiracy. In Central Bureau of Investigation versus K. Narayana Rao [(2012) 9 SCC 512] to which one of us (Ranjan Gogoi, J.) was a party, it has been held by this Court that a criminal prosecution on the basis of such bald and omnibus statement/allegations against the panel advocates of the Bank ought not to be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he cannot be mulcted with the criminal prosecution, particularly, in the absence of tangible evidence that he associated with other conspirators. At the most, he may be liable for gross negligence or professional misconduct if it is established by acceptable evidence and cannot be charged for the offence under Sections 420 and 109 of IPC along with other conspirators without proper and acceptable ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
