2021 (3) TMI 1275

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... under Section 164 of the 2013 Act. Moreover, it was rather beyond the scope of the jurisdiction of the Registrar of Companies to direct that the documents filed by the Directors would not be approved/registered/recorded and thus would not be available in the registry for public viewing, thereby depriving the petitioner and other Directors from exercising their legal rights in that regard. Appli .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... being no fault on the part of the petitioner as far as the compliance of the provisions of Section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013 (2013 Act) and other relevant provisions is concerned, the Director Identification Number (DIN) of the petitioner was erroneously deactivated on the ground of such non-compliance. Learned counsel for the petitioner indicates that an order dated June 24, 2016, was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... evident that there was no fault on the part of the petitioner justifying deactivation of the DIN of the petitioner under Section 164 of the 2013 Act. Moreover, it was rather beyond the scope of the jurisdiction of the Registrar of Companies to direct that the documents filed by the Directors would not be approved/registered/recorded and thus would not be available in the registry for public viewin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X