9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (3) TMI 1276X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... h, 2006 was made available to the appellant only on 17th July, 2018 that too after repeated letters since the year 2012 till the year 2018 - HELD THAT:- Department has delayed the dispatch of order in original dated 2nd March, 2006 by 12 years. This delay is quiet shocking in view of the mandate upon the Department to make the copy of order available to the parties concerned at the earliest so as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... date the physical hearings are not resumed the officer concerned has to mark his presence in person, virtually - Matter be heard on 27.04.2021. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... thereof was made available to the appellant only after his request dated 15th May, 2018 to his authorised representative, namely, Mr. Rajender. 3. These documents are sufficient to hold that Department has delayed the dispatch of order in original dated 2nd March, 2006 by 12 years. This delay is quiet shocking in view of the mandate upon the Department to make the copy of order available to the p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ssary implication says so. The documents as produced by the Department are absolutely silent about any explanation being rendered for delay of more than 12 years. 4. In view of the above observation, I deem it important that the explanation from the respective Officer i.e. Joint Commissioner, Jaipur be called for about not delivering the order pronounced to the appellant for more than 12 years. T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
