2008 (8) TMI 1002

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, while issuing notice of motion in the writ petition filed by Respondent No. 1 for striking down Clause 21-A of the Terms and Conditions of Supply framed Under Section 49 read with Section 79J of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, unconditionally stayed the demand of the arrears of electricity dues raised by the Appellant-Nigam and directed it to release elect .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for the Appellant is not applicable to the present case because validity of Clause 21-A of the Terms and Conditions of Supply which is under challenge in the writ petition was not the subject matter of challenge in that case. 5. We have considered the respective arguments. 6. Before proceeding further, it is apposite to mention that, on 4th August, 2008, we had, after taking note of the und .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ly, distinguished the earlier judgment in Isha Marbles v. Bihar State Electricity Board 1995 (2) S.C.C. 648 and directed the Respondent to pay a sum of Rupees twenty five lakhs with a further direction that, in the event of deposit of the amount, the supply of electricity will not be disconnected. In the present case, a sum of Rupees ten lakhs has already been deposited by Respondent No. 1. Theref .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X