1984 (4) TMI 22

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... "), at the instance of the Department, raises the following question for the opinion of the court: " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in holding that the assessee was entitled to claim development rebate for the assessment year 1965-66 without creating development rebate reserve ? " The facts giving rise to this reference are these. M .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... unt for development rebate. The AAC allowed relief on several other counts thereby reducing the total income by about Rs. 1,78,000 and directing further relief to be given on recomputation of the depreciation. The assessee filed further appeal before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (for short called " the Tribunal "). The Tribunal held that for the actual allowance of development rebate, the c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , the Tribunal held that the lower authorities were not justified in ignoring the assessee's claim of development rebate. Accordingly, the Tribunal set aside their order in so far as it related to a consideration of this claim and restored the matter to the ITO. The ITO was called upon to consider the assessee's claim on merits and quantify the development rebate, if any, which was to be carried f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X